Volume 3, Chapter
VII
By Michel de Saint Pierre
L'Aurore – 1 November 1979
My parish in
Normandy was recently visited by the “priest in charge of
the region." He had been sent by the diocese. What was the
purpose of his visit? To instill in our minds and to put into effect
the famous "Sunday assemblies without a priest.”
We were told,
in a most official manner, that our parish priest could not serve
his three parishes, and that we must therefore, at regular intervals,
manage without him. But how? Simply by learning to celebrate a Sunday
“service” without a priest.
The “priest
in charge of the region" was, needless to say, dressed in civilian
clothes. He explained that the shortage of priests in France was
posing problems, and the solution of the problem was being offered
to us: the laity must take turns to officiate. To begin with, on
one Sunday out of two we would recite the prayers of the Mass under
the direction of one of the parishioners – and we could even
receive Communion at the hands of the laity present, as “sufficient
number of consecrated Hosts would be provided for us.”
Now in our
part of Normandy the parishes are small and not far apart, and until
now our priests, each of whom has a car, had no difficulty in serving
each Sunday the two or three churches in their charge. Moreover,
each farming family has a car: the majority of the younger generation
has either a motorcycle or a motor scooter. So, in a case of necessity,
nothing could be easier than to attend a neighboring church to hear
Mass. I pointed this out to the "priest in charge of the region,"
who merely shook his head.
"It is
a question of knowing," he told me, "whether you want
to be scattered in various churches or whether you want to retain
your identity as a parish."
"No,"
I replied. "It is a question of whether Rome has decided, yes
or no, that assisting at Sunday Mass is no longer obligatory. What
you are offering us is merely a prayer meeting of the laity. Will
you therefore kindly tell those listening to us that Sunday observance
at a prayer meeting without a priest does not absolve us from the
obligation of attending Mass in a neighboring parish?"
Not only did
the "priest in charge of the region" refuse to do this,
but he began extolling the necessity of a truly parochial community,
etc. In other words, I heard with my own ears a diocesan priest
inviting a group of rural laity to cease celebrating the Lord's
Day by their presence and by their participation in the Eucharistic
Sacrifice.
However, the
following Sunday the first attempt was made in our parish: we had
our little gatherings without a priest, but I categorically refused
to attend. But good sense and loyalty prevailed and these Sunday
gatherings soon stopped: they have never re-started. Nevertheless,
doubt had been sown in innocent souls who no longer quite understand
what the Curé d' Ars had so accurately described as the "Sublime
Mass."
An enquiry
I later made among the members of the Credo Society indicated that
this was no isolated case, nor an attempt which would not be followed
up. Is this practice, of members of the laity replacing the priest,
not, in fact, an excellent pretext for the French Episcopate to
cover up the decline in the number of seminaries, and the growing
lack, in France, of vocations to the priesthood? I now know that
in many dioceses attempts had been made to introduce these pitiful
celebrations without a priest – thus making our churches more
and more like Protestant temples: heaven grant that these attempts
may fail! For my part, I beg all those reading this article to refuse
to attend these so-called Masses, these ceremonies lacking both
meaning and substance – ceremonies without the anointed hands
of the priest, which alone have the power to transform the bread
and the wine, each day and in every church, throughout the world,
into the Body and Blood of Our Savior, Jesus Christ.
But this is
not the end of the affair. Today, at the Jean-Bart Centre, the pastoral,
sacramental and liturgical center of the Archdiocese of Paris, a
most strange booklet was published entitled "The Sunday of
Yesterday and the Sunday of Today." While insisting that Sunday
Mass remains obligatory, the content of this brochure is admirably
summarized by Father Auvray:
• To
be able to replace the obligation of personally attending Mass
by sending a representative.
• To
disassociate Sunday from the Lord's Day, which must become a moveable
feast during the week.
• To
disassociate Mass from Sunday and invent another type of celebration,
not solely the Mass.
So much ought
to be quoted but only one passage will have to suffice: "To
be a practicing Catholic would no longer necessarily mean attending
Mass each Sunday, but being always most careful to attend, either
in person or by representative, each weekly religious assembly.”
Thus the bonds
of solidarity and representations would replace loyalty and culpability.
In the customary
jargon used for such commentaries and with the customary pretentious
verbal diarrhea, the Jean-Bart Center presents us with sixty-five
pages of the same style, causing mental confusion and casting doubt
on teachings which Rome never ceases to re-affirm. Rome, whose traditional
loyalty the Center would appear to doubt: "The present rigidity,"
the brochure informs us, “permits nothing whatsoever.”
In my view,
nothing could be added to this admission – if not this: that
this terrifying document produced by Jean-Bart Center be brought
without delay to the notice of His Holiness Pope John Paul II.
Courtesy of the Angelus
Press, Regina Coeli House
2918 Tracy Avenue, Kansas City, MO 64109
|