Archbishop
LEFEBVRE and the
VATICAN
1976
Extract
from Two Conferences
Preached by Cardinal Wojtyla
to Pope Paul VI in 1976
Important milestones on the theological journey of John Paul II
to Assisi are the retreat conferences which Karol Wojtyla, in 1976,
preached to Pope Paul VI and a few of his most intimate colleagues
in the Vatican. They were published under the title of the original
Italian work: Segno di contradizzione, Meditazoni (Milan,
1977). The English translation: Sign of Contradiction appeared
in 1979 from the Seaburg Press,96
thus after the election of Karol Wojtyla as Pope. A commentary by
Fr. Johannes Dörmann on these conferences in particular and the
thinking of Pope John Paul II in general is available in English.97
The recommendation for the book makes an accurate observation: “Here
one gets to know [the new Pope] most intimately.” Theology and spirituality
are so mutually related that they make up a unified body.
The
retreat conferences are no mere pious exhortations, but an extensive
theological and spiritual meditation which opens with the very essence
of religion, the encounter between God and man, and then strives
to realize this encounter or, as the Cardinal puts it: “to get as
close as possible to God and to be penetrated by his Spirit.”
I.
A Natural Theology of Religions
“The itinerarium
mentis in Deum (journey of the human spirit to God) emerges
from the depths of created things and from a man's inmost being.
The modern mentality as it makes its way finds its support in human
experience, and in affirmation of the transcendence of the human
person. Man goes beyond himself, man must go beyond himself. The
tragedy of atheistic humanism—so brilliantly analyzed by Fr. de
Lubac (Atheisme et sens de l'homme, Paris, 1969) is that
it strips man of his transcendental character, destroying his ultimate
significance as a person. Man goes beyond himself by reaching out
towards God, and thus progresses beyond the limits imposed on him
by created things, by space and time, by his own contingency. The
transcendence of the person is closely bound up with responsiveness
to the one who himself is the touchstone for all our judgments concerning
being, goodness, truth and beauty. It is bound up with responsiveness
to the one who is nevertheless totally Other, because He is infinite.
“The concept
of infinity is not unknown to man. He makes use of it in his scientific
work, in mathematics, for instance. So there certainly is room in
him, in his intellectual understanding, for Him Who is infinite,
the God of boundless majesty, the one to Whom Holy Scripture and
the Church bear witness saying: ‘Holy, holy, holy, God of the universe,
heaven and earth are full of your glory.’ This God is professed
in His silence by the Trappist or the Camaldolite. It is to him
that the desert Bedouin turns at his hour for prayer. And perhaps
the Buddhist, too, rapt in contemplation as he purifies his thought,
preparing the way to Nirvana. God in His absolute transcendence,
God who transcends absolutely the whole of creation, all that is
visible and comprehensible.”98
Rev.
Fr. Joannes Dörmann comments: “This is a natural theology of all
religions in a nutshell.” This is a way of immanence which
neglects the theodicy [i.e., that part of metaphysics by
which through the natural light of human reason we can know with
certitude attributes of God] recommended by the Church (Vatican
I, Denzinger, The Sources of Catholic Dogma, 1806), which
starts from the mirror of the creatures to reach up to the Creator.
It is akin to the vital immanence condemned by St. Pius X
(Pascendi Gregis, Denzinger, The Sources of Catholic
Dogma, 2074). It presents itself as a common denominator between
the revealed Faith and human false religions which are concocted
by human minds.
II. The Theology of Redemption of Cardinal Wojtyla
Teaching
of the Council on Redemption
and the Interpretation of the Cardinal
From the Pastoral
Constitution, Gaudium et Spes, of Vatican II, Cardinal Wojtyla
chooses a key text on Christ (§10) to base his thesis of universal
redemption.
The conciliar
text says: “The Church believes that Christ, who died and was risen
for the sake of all (II Cor. 5:15), can show man the way and strengthen
him through the Spirit in order to be worthy of his destiny:.…”
Cardinal Wojtyla
says: “Thus the birth of the Church at the time of the messianic
and redemptive death of Christ coincided with the birth of ‘the
new man’—whether or not man was aware of such a rebirth and whether
or not he accepted it. At that moment, man’s existence acquired
a new dimension, very simply expressed by St. Paul as ‘in Christ’”
(cf. Rom. 6:23; 8:39; 12:5; 15:17; 16:7 et al.).
“Man exists
‘in Christ,’ and he had so existed from the beginning in God's eternal
plan; but it is by virtue of Christ’s death and resurrection that
this ‘existence in Christ’ became historical fact, with roots in
time and space” (p.91ff.).99
Fr. Dörmann
comments: “Everything speaks in favor of the fact that the Cardinal
teaches the objective and subjective universality of Redemption.”100]
Does the Cardinal formulate a thesis of the objective and subjective
universality of redemption?...that is, by the Cross of Christ all
men are not only objectively redeemed101
but also subjectively justified.102
The
answer to this question is found in the following passage from Cardinal
Woytyla’s retreat to Pope Paul VI in which he dealt with the realization
of the divine plan of salvation in history:
“This
is the point of history when all men are, so to speak, ‘conceived’
afresh and follow a new course within God’s plan—the plan prepared
by the Father in the truth of the Word and in the gift of Love.
It is the point at which the history of mankind makes a fresh start,
no longer dependent on human conditioning—if one may put it like
that. This fresh starting point belongs in the divine order of things,
in the divine perspective on man and the world. The finite, human
categories of time and space are almost completely secondary. All
men, from the beginning of the world until its end, have been redeemed
and justified (giustificati) by Christ and His cross.”103
In
the above passages, and in the talks on the meeting at Assisi, there
is a confusion between the goal to which every man is called, and
the actual realization of this goal. Our Lord taught this
difference very clearly: “Many are called, but few are chosen” (Mt.
22:14). At the beginning of his Gospel, St. John makes a clear distinction
between souls which receive Christ and those which don’t. “He came
unto His own, and His own received Him not. But as many as received
Him, He gave them power to be made the sons of God, to them that
believe in His name” (Jn. 1:11,12). One becomes a child of God by
the grace of Christ. The human nature common to men is absolutely
unable to give us such a dignity.
96.
Karol Wojtyla, Sign of Contradiction (New York: The Seaburg
Press, 1979), p.2.
97.
Available from Angelus Press, currently in three volumes
(Pope John Paul II’s Theologi¬cal Journey to the Prayer
Meeting of Religions in Assisi).
98.
Pope John Paul II’s Theological Journey to the Prayer
Meeting of Religions in Assisi, Part I, pp.49-50.
99.
Ibid., p.60.
100.
Ibid., p.63.
101.
Objectively, the sins of men are sufficiently paid for. Our Lord
paid sufficiently for everyone.
102.
Subjectively, the sins of men are cleansed by the infusion
of grace, but not everyone accepts the grace of Our Lord so they
remain uncleansed.
103.
Ibid., p.64-65.
Courtesy of the Angelus
Press, Regina Coeli House
2918 Tracy Avenue, Kansas City, MO 64109
|